Posted by Health Wellness | Posted in workplace wellness | Posted on 10-06-2010
Compliance with health insurance portability and accountability act (HIPAA) non-discrimination rules is a big challenge for wellness programs. the old rules were unclear about which incentives passed muster.
That’s all changed, with the rules established earlier this year by the DOL and USA Treasury Department. the rules themselves haven’t changed, but they’ve been clarified. Here’s what you need to know –
‘Participation incentives’ are fine
As long as you structure incentives as rewards for wellness participation, the new rules provide a lot of freedom. All of these are fine under health insurance portability and accountability act (HIPAA) –
reimbursing all or a portion of the cost of gym membership
financial rewards for undergoing health risk (assessment|appraisal}s so long as the reward is based on participation rather than test results
encouraging preventive care by waiving co-pays or deductibles for these services (i.e., well-baby visits or prenatal care)
reimbursing workers for the cost of smoking-cessation programs without regard to the result, and
offering rewards tied to workers attending a monthly health education seminar or working with a health coach.
Conditional rewards OK if…
But what when you want to make the reward conditional on participants meeting specific health goals? Example – Employees who achieve a cholesterol count under 200 get a 20 percent reduction in the cost of their medical plan contributions pending results of an annual cholesterol test.
The feds say it’s OK under HIPAA to do this, too, but your plan must meet five additional requirements –
the reward can’t exceed 20 percent of the cost of employee-only (or, if you allow dependents to participate, employee-plus-dependent) coverage under your health plan.
the standards ought to be reasonable (e.g., you can’t limit rewards to folks who can run a marathon). the rewards also can’t be used as a backhanded way to negatively single out certain staff members (e.g., rewards for all non-diabetics).
Participants must have the opportunity to qualify for the reward at least once per year (e.g., a smoker who fails to quit this year gets another chance next year).
Rewards should be available to all “similarly situated individuals.” In other words, you can’t make a company-paid weight control program available to certain workers but not others.
If, for medical reasons, it’s unreasonably challenging for an individual to satisfy conditions that are otherwise reasonable, you have to offer an alternative. Example – A pregnant worker may not be able to meet certain standards, so you have to offer her an alternative.
Negative incentives violate health insurance portability and accountability act (HIPAA)
So what’s not allowed under health insurance portability and accountability act (HIPAA)’s non-discrimination rules? Anything that punishes individuals for their health conditions or health risks.
The rules prohibit employers from charging different premiums, contributions, co-pays or deductibles based on personal health factors such as obesity or tobacco use. Nonetheless, it’s OK to reimburse these expenses based on someone’s participation in your wellness program, without regard to success.
In addition, the feds have added an important new non-discrimination rule – Businesss’ health plans can’t deny benefits for treatment of injuries resulting from a medical condition, even if the condition wasn’t diagnosed before the injury.
For example, some health plans have a “suicide exclusion” that denies payment for treating self-inflicted wounds from a suicide attempt. Now let’s suppose the worker suffers from clinical depression. Even if the depression was undiagnosed before the suicide attempt, it’s illegal for your plan to deny benefits to this worker.
